Professional programmes · Technical knowledgeService information
International Accreditation Center
Verify a recordMy account

Observatory · AI governance

Evaluating AI governance: distinguishing management evidence from claims

How to read evidence about the way an organisation governs AI, and why a management system reference does not attest the behaviour of each model.

Format
Methodological guide
Area
AI governance
Published
31 October 2026
Author
International Accreditation Center
Scope
General criteria. This guide does not assess any specific organisation, facility or product.

Steps

  • Start from uses, not from toolsList where AI influences decisions, who approves its use and what happens when outputs are wrong.
  • Separate system and model questionsGovernance evidence shows how risks are managed; model evaluation tests a specific system. Both may be needed.
  • Ask for traceable recordsApprovals, risk assessments, monitoring results and incident records allow a conclusion to be checked.
  • Check supplier conditionsContracts and documentation from model or data providers define what the organisation can actually control.
  • State the limits of a conclusionA conclusion applies to the scope, period and evidence reviewed.